This is just to say, and perhaps Mr. Winfield can clarify if I've misunderstood his interpretation, that there is a difference between saying that there “shall” be no net loss of fish habitat versus saying that the minister “shall consider” whether there should be no net loss of fish habitat. I think that without my amendment, providing no net loss of fish habitat remains at the minister's discretion, but it is a factor that he or she will consider.
On May 22nd, 2018. See this statement in context.