I have one final question.
A common theme that we hear in a lot of our studies is that in the transactions between DFO and local people there is a relative absence of local knowledge in some of the final decisions that are made. Local people feel they're there and they know the landscape. They know, in this case, the needs of their harbours, and sometimes what they end up getting is something quite different from what they believe would be effective. We've had anecdotal information that sometimes what is delivered actually didn't work as well as what they had asked for.
Where there is a difference between what they recommend and what is delivered, is there any transparency? Is there any reason given to them why they would do something else, instead of what the local people have advised?