Knowing that, Christine, I think you mentioned the higher costs of the fish, etc. Ultimately, the customer is the person who has to pay for the fish and has to decide whether they are going to choose one cut over the other. If they're at a particular retailer, they're going to pick the cheaper one. If they need to buy food for their families, they're going to choose one because it's $5 a fillet, or whatever the cost is, over the one that's $10. I see the competitive need in the industry, I guess, to do what it does.
I would ask Robert again, I guess, if this is implemented.... Let's use your company. Have you thought of a worst-case scenario? What would happen if the government decided to do this tomorrow? What would happen to the company?