I would say that regardless of whether it was the previous section 35 or the current section 35, there always are some interesting situations. I can remember two or three examples where someone wanted to put a barrier in place to ensure that sea lamprey couldn't get up the river. We said, no, wait a second here, we have rules about fish passage.
You find things like that. There have a been a number of recreational groups who wanted to do something for fish habitat improvements, who actually impacted habitat. We therefore had to take a look at it.
I'd say that's the case with the current section but with the previous one as well. We do need to make sure that common sense prevails in either case and ensure that fisheries protection is what we're all serving going forward.