Yes, I think we are—and I'll use this word—too liberal in how we run a fishery. For instance, we can look at white sturgeon, an endangered species in the lower Fraser, and we still run a multi-million-dollar fishery on that stock and we just say, “Oh, you can catch and release”. Well, is that the way we should protect something that's endangered? We do a lot of those types of things in government, or we did, and we still do to basically keep the public happy so they can fish. At times you do have to reduce fisheries quite drastically.
The fisheries people will say that you can't do that, that you're going to lose public trust and that you have to let them keep fishing. That just doesn't make sense.
We seem to put more money at times into endangered species under SARA than we do to maintain healthy fish stocks. That's truly unfortunate.