I don't think I disagree that programs for conservation are extremely important. I just think it's very important, when we're talking about habitat protection, that we recognize the breadth of activities that can harm fish habitat, and the need, perhaps, to create some detailed regulation to deal with these individual situations, which perhaps you're even suggesting.
To my mind, it can't be an either-or. I think that's the experience that people who are struggling with the act are really struggling to figure out. There's just such a broad range of activities that can harm habitat. Only focusing on one thing, such as habitat conservation or restoration, is just not going to get us to where we need to be.