Thank you.
Further, in your submission today, you said:
This serious harm to fish provision is not expressly about habitat protection. The scope of protected habitat is limited by the requirement that it be habitat of a commercial, recreational, or aboriginal fishery.
For some reason you left out of the quote “or to fish that support such a fishery”. I'm just wondering why you left that part of it out, because I can't think of a fish or fishery anywhere that doesn't support, in some way, commercial, recreational, or aboriginal fisheries.