Given the importance of restoring the lost protections, the first nations coalition that came together to create the submission before you wasn't saying, “Don't do anything.” They're saying, clearly, “Do something, and do it properly.” The important thing is to restore the HADD provisions and introduce more protective measures in the modernizing of the act, such as a purpose section, and as I've mentioned, the aboriginal government section. I think those are ways in which we're really going to restrict discretion of the minister.
On the earlier question around gravel and why gravel slipped under the radar, one problem with the old act was the unstructured discretion of the minister under the act. What we're proposing are very structured processes for the exercise of that discretion. I think it's going to become a much more operative way of implementing the act to protect fish.
First nations definitely want better and restored protections under the act.