There are 20 Aichi targets, and the purpose of the Aichi targets is to halt biodiversity loss globally. Aichi target six is on good fisheries management. There has been a huge focus on target 11. It kind of rose as the tall poppy for protected area and received a lot of attention. The other Aichi targets are equally of importance, and it's equally important that Canada reports against them.
What counts under the different targets.... We shouldn't assume that things like good fisheries management measures have to count under the protected areas target. They should count under target six. That's the point I was trying to make. There's a rush to show that we've met target 11, but it's also important to show that we've met target six.