I think it's really important to point out that the allocation policy is species specific. When you look at chinook or coho, for example, the recreational sector has a priority access to those fish, compared with the commercial sector. That's not speaking about the food, social, and ceremonial, which comes off the top. When you look at Fraser sockeye, though, the commercial sector has the priority, not when we're talking about food, social, and ceremonial but between the recreational and the commercial sectors. You need to look at it from a species-specific basis. The allocation policy doesn't set an actual amount, but it's up to 5% for those species that don't have the recreational priority.
On May 4th, 2017. See this statement in context.