If you have no fisheries management in your marine space, then an MPA will benefit your fisheries in the sense that it will protect the core of biodiversity in there. Because you have no fisheries management, no effort control, no input control, no output control on your fisheries, it's a wide open fishery, so there's no stock assessment, there are no TACs being set, and there are no limits on your fisheries. That MPA will help protect your biodiversity in your marine space. That's what that means.
That's the discussion, as opposed to areas where you do have fisheries management. Canada is identified as one of the top five fisheries managed countries on the planet. We have extensive fisheries management. Most of our fisheries have either input or output controls on them. We have spatial and temporal closures on every fishery, so we have fisheries management. You're not going to get the benefits to the fishery by an MPA, a reserve, a closed MPA, as you would in an area where there is no fisheries management. That's the point that's being made there.