Something's been pointed out here, namely, the similarities between PV-1 and what follows with NDP-1. They are not similar enough such that they would be coupled together and there would be only one vote. However, this is where the wrench comes in. Adopting one means it's difficult to adopt the other. We're going to have a vote on each one, but the committee has to decide which one it goes with.
That being said, we just heard PV-1, and now, to try to make things more simple, I'm going to go to Mr. Donnelly to discuss NDP-1. That way, if we have to make a choice, the choice will be in front of us and both members will have had their say.
With the committee's permission, before I go to Mr. Doherty, can I go to Mr. Donnelly to discuss NDP-1?
Is any more explanation required? They are different enough that they require two different votes, but you cannot have one with the other. Therefore, this committee has to come to terms with which one it wants.
I'm now going to Mr. Donnelly to discuss his amendment.