Thank you both for your testimony here.
I'm going to just pose a question to you, with an invitation to follow up with some thoughts once you've had a chance to consider it.
We've become sensitive in some of the other studies we've done to a proper balance between legislation and regulation. The legislation hardwires something in, and once it's there it is relatively difficult to change or amend as conditions change. Regulation, of course, is a bit easier to deal with. You made me think of it, Ms. Venton, when you talked about the introduction of stock recovery and whether or not that's a hard-wired issue or something that again, as conditions change—through climate change, for example—needs to be better parked in regulation. If you could look at this legislation through that lens and get back to us with some recommendations as to what appropriately belongs where, that would be good.
Ms. Venton, I wanted to get a little more reflection on cumulative impacts. You started an answer, and you ran out of time. Do you remember what that was, and do you want to complete it?