Sure, and I added a bit of it in response to the question from Mr. Stewart.
I was talking about the need to ensure that the public registry includes all the instruments that authorize harm to fish habitat. Under the act, there are a variety of ways HADD can be sanctioned. For the registry to be truly useful as a tool to notify Canadians about what's happening on the [Inaudible--Editor] waters and also to be useful as a tool for DFO, we have to make sure all that information is available. At the moment, there's only a limited subset of information about what kinds of authorizations to harm habitat will actually be included in the public registry.