Agreed, but moving to a conversation on large numbers of marked fish, then, because your answer was a perfect segue into my thoughts, several groups, whether it be sport fishing groups or others, are arguing that right now the chinook retention closures and so on are having a devastating economic impact on some businesses on the west coast. They argue that they could move to a marked selective fishery right away, given the fact that there are so many marked fish in the system from outside of Canada.
Canada, in that agreement, marks only a certain percentage, a very small percentage, especially of chinook salmon. Would you agree with their assessment that we should move to full marking of chinook hatchery salmon and move to marked retention fisheries? Would that be something that would be viable not only for the sport fishing industry? Could that be something that we could get a first nations involvement in with not only the hatchery production but also the retention for food, social and ceremonial uses on marked salmon and almost run a parallel marked salmon versus wild salmon fishery to protect wild salmon stocks?