Okay. I think some of Monsieur Rodon's suggestions around co-management are really key. I think it's about the parties working together and talking together.
The legal context here is complicated, right? It's not black and white. That was in the article which I submitted to the committee. It's not black and white. The Supreme Court has this very complex test that requires the government to meet its fiduciary duty and the honour of the Crown, but it's not a checklist of what [Technical difficulty—Editor] It's about listening to each other. I think it's really recognizing that the Mi'kmaq people have an interest in not just the fish, but also around the management of this right as well, and in being treated as a nation and not simply a stakeholder. I think that's really key.
I think the other part of this is that you can't see this as a one-time thing: “Oh, we'll solve this; we'll throw some money at it, and it's going to go away.” It's about a relationship between two nations. It will grow and change, and it will continue to require nurturing that relationship and actually looking at things. What is a moderate livelihood in 2020 is going to be different from what is a moderate livelihood in 2030, and there's the role of the parties in that.
Various other factors can influence that, but those would be some of the key things.