The short answer is that we haven't seen really any movement towards such a thing as a salmon and dike fund, but the other part of my response is that the landscape for these conversations has significantly shifted now that we're talking about such a major investment in flood control, and now, with the amendments to the Fisheries Act in 2019, we heard at the last meeting of this study from a senior fisheries manager that there's no going back in terms of doing things the old way. That gives me hope. I think that maybe the conversations on the salmon and dike fund were pre-November floods. That was our response because we were getting a lot of questions and resistance about how to do things in a new way.
Since that time, we've also learned that doing things in a fish-friendly manner isn't necessarily more expensive. It just involves using different suppliers and learning about the different technologies. Rather than having an add-on salmon and dike fund, where we give extra money to incorporate technology that people aren't used to, I think the [Technical difficulty—Editor] ensure that that technology is incorporated into all our decisions at every location as part of the new infrastructure spending.