Yes. On the point of order, I don't think anyone would have any objections if the witnesses would like to leave, but maybe they also want to hear what Mr. Arnold is talking about. I think it's very important. I think everyone in this committee, on this point of order, has a desire and a right to hear what Mr. Arnold is laying out.
I don't think anyone would dispute that report after report after report has gone in, many times unanimous, and that we've had very few updates and absolutely very little action done on the reports that have been brought forward. That is what Mr. Arnold is laying out. He has every right to do that, because that is the business of this committee.
Why would we get to amending the Fisheries Act when so much should have been acted upon long before this? Why don't we deal with what's already been authorized to be dealt with under the existing Fisheries Act?