When the department presents the minister with advice, we only present options that are viable options. The option the minister decided upon we believe to be a viable option. In fact, the science advice indicates that there is a very significant probability that the stock will remain in the cautious zone, and indeed, it is only about 1% lower probability than were the minister to have rolled over the stewardship fishery.
The difference between the commercial fishery, which is now in place, and the stewardship fishery, which was previously in place, of course is not the full 18,000 tonnes. It's only a difference of 5,000 tonnes for Canadian harvesters and, as I note, the science advice based on that is a very limited difference in the impact on the stock.