That's a really important example. Thank you so much, Ms. Strobel. I'm going to come back to you, but I am going to move to Dr. Mordecai.
Dr. Mordecai, you talked about the precautionary principle. One thing I hear over and over again in the community when I'm talking to various people about open-net fish farms is that the rationale to either delay action or justify action not being taken is based on the fact that there's inconclusive science. I hear that from people who have concerns.
My question is, how does that argument contradict directly the responsibility of the minister to move forward with the precautionary principle?