But you're not doing the sounding stuff. This is a mathematical formula based on landings and market, not on the actual science of the size of the biomass. I'm wondering when that will be done. That's my first part.
The second part is that, without it, there's an eco-certification that the product cannot get, because we don't have an idea of whether or not we're fishing this responsibly, other than algorithms based on landings and market needs, basically, rather than the actual biomass.
When we talk about science being “critical”, I don't understand why we haven't made the effort in this region to do that part of the science.