I can give you one example. That's for species that do not have quota licences. On the west coast, that's the shrimp trawl fishery, where the effort is very low compared to what it could be. The reason for this is that DFO, in the name of conservation, has a bycatch level for species of eulachon of four tonnes, which corresponds to less than 0.01% of that important species. DFO does not want to discuss changing that arbitrary level.
DFO, in this case, has strongly erred on the side of conservation. It does not take any consideration for socio-economic aspects in such a fishery. I think that on the west coast DFO has really gone too far on the conservation. It's much more balanced on the east coast.