Evidence of meeting #71 for Fisheries and Oceans in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was investors.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Duncan Cameron  Director, British Columbia Crab Fishermen's Association
Brad Callaghan  Associate Deputy Commissioner, Policy, Planning and Advocacy Directorate, Competition Bureau
Anthony Durocher  Deputy Commissioner, Competition Promotion Branch, Competition Bureau
Pierre-Yves Guay  Associate Deputy Commissioner, Cartels Directorate , Competition Bureau
Shendra Melia  Director General, Trade in Services, Intellectual Property and Investment, Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development
James Burns  Senior Director, Policy, Department of Industry

5:30 p.m.

NDP

Lisa Marie Barron NDP Nanaimo—Ladysmith, BC

Thank you, Mr. Chair. I'll try not to take up my entire question period asking the question.

Thank you for your responses.

Mr. Burns, I was reflecting a bit on some of the responses you provided before. I don't know whether this is going to be a personal question or not.

Basically, I was thinking about the fact that you were speaking to some of the reputational challenges that may occur to moving forward in this direction on changing the foreign investment around our fisheries and so on. At the same time, what we're seeing is a foreign extraction of our public natural resources. I mean, this is a finite natural resource.

Wouldn't it be to our benefit to take the time needed to restructure our licensing policies to ensure that the benefits are going back into our communities and local fishers here in Canada instead of being extracted into other countries?

5:30 p.m.

Senior Director, Policy, Department of Industry

James Burns

Your point about restricting licences is not something that would fall within the remit of the Investment Canada Act, but what I can say regarding reputational risk is that Canada is seen as a preferred destination for foreign investment, and that's partly because we have a secure marketplace. We have a degree of investor certainty that is put in place by having strong, robust marketplace frameworks. If one were to selectively choose—“we will be doing this in this sector, we'll be doing this in a separate sector and we'll be doing this in another”—it would undermine that sort of wider national consideration for a secure and transparent marketplace.

I would simply point out that it's something that would be front of mind for us, because our goal as a regulator is to ensure we have clear and transparent processes for review that allow commerce to happen in a fair and consistent fashion.

5:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Vice-Chair Conservative Mel Arnold

Six seconds are all that's left, so that's not much.

I want to thank the witnesses for being here today and taking the time to appear for us. I think we got some good information that came out today. Thank you very much.

I'll move on to a piece of committee business. The witnesses are free to go if they like, if they'd like to depart.

For next week, on June 5 we're scheduled to spend the first hour receiving a DFO update on the government response to the 2019 report on B.C. licensing and to then spend the second hour on drafting instructions for the foreign ownership and concentration report. I'd like to ask the committee if they would like to push the foreign ownership and concentration drafting instructions to the following Monday, June 12, as the second hour of that meeting is currently vacant.

Would that be acceptable to everyone?

5:30 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

5:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Vice-Chair Conservative Mel Arnold

Okay. That's great. We've consulted with the chair's office and the clerk, and they've said that there are no problems with this. With that, we'll move the drafting instructions to the 12th.

Is there anything else?

Thank you. The meeting is adjourned.