I just want to ensure clarity of my understanding of the message that the directives that you are speaking of relate to law enforcement officers' independence to use judgment throughout the enforcement continuum that we apply as part of the tools that we engage in that enforcement continuum. Those tools can involve education, ticketing, arrest and release, seizure of gear or, ultimately, submission of charge request packages to the Public Prosecution Service of Canada.
I'd also like to add that we have a right to protect the rights-based fisheries and FSC as well. These are sometimes highly charged situations, and our fisheries officers do an outstanding job in those situations and implement their best judgment on what part of the enforcement continuum to implement, be it education, ticketing or further elements of that enforcement continuum.