I'm not familiar with that particular study, but the point is an important one—let's not focus entirely on the numbers game, as has been talked about today, but also the qualitative elements. Is it contributing to the halting and reversing of biodiversity loss? To do that, you can't just create an arbitrary percentage and put it on a map. You need to put together a system that's “well-connected”, “ecologically representative”, “of importance to biodiversity” and “of importance for ecosystem functions and services”. Those are summarized in paragraph 31.
I would add to that to also keep in mind the socio-economic, as well, not just the environmental...so these are initiatives that contribute to the long-term sustainability of those whose livelihoods depend on marine resources. That holistic view, looking at the quality and not just the quantity, would, I think, benefit not only the—