I wouldn't consider focusing on the worst-case scenario because we do—like Kathy has mentioned before—our best to reduce the impact of marine protection on fishing, on harvesting. As we move through the progression of establishing sites, it's best to look at the sites we've already established.
On the west coast, we have three marine protected areas that are established. There's some level of fishing in each of those marine protected areas. It really depends on the conservation objectives we are trying to preserve. Again, we tailor the activities or the restriction of activities based on what we're trying to protect.
Going forward, we will do the same thing. We will look again at the objectives for each of the areas of interest we plan to pursue and work with harvesters and all others to reduce the impact to those activities while still meeting our conservation objectives.