For the peer review, I might turn back to my colleague from science.
If I could, I'll clarify something. In some of DFO's analysis of, say, where fishing occurs, we did look at what areas were suitable for offshore wind from an industry point of view. That wasn't a DFO decision around what areas are suitable, but we did layer that with where fishing occurs. The data we provided was just on where fishing occurs.
I'm sorry for making that correction.
I'll turn to my colleague from science.