Thank you for the question.
It was actually 32% of SFA 4 and less than 29% for SFA 5. If you were to look across the region, Atlantic Canada and, indeed, both coasts, I don't think you'd see that elsewhere. Other indigenous populations have used litigation to make that point known to the Government of Canada. I don't believe the Nunatsiavut Government has gone there yet, but it certainly is impinging on our ability to plan for future investments. As I said earlier, I've had many individuals from different regions look at partnering. Everybody looks at, obviously, a quota or what could be emerging in groundfish, for example.
Unless and until we see a fair recognition, if you will, of our rights under the Labrador Inuit Land Claims Agreement for a more fair and just pathway to achieving an equitable share of what we consider our natural and adjacent resource, then we're not going to get there, and we will not be in a position to create better and more favourable economic conditions for the people we serve. Our company is owned by the 7,000 Nunatsiavut beneficiaries, who are my stakeholders and shareholders, so we're obligated to not just operate profitable, sustainable companies. We're looking at, in this particular case, a resource that's been with us that we've harvested for years and years, way before the other foreign fleets, and we're going to be here for millennia.
That's—