I understand that. I do understand the linkage between you and the Canadian equivalent. What I was leading toward....
It's a little unfortunate, perhaps, to put you on the spot in the sense of trying to get you to speak for everyone else. Clearly there are things that you are doing and advocating for, as part of the AMI. That's fair. It's always difficult to ask witnesses to speak for other entities and groups that they may know about in general terms but not so specifically.
I really was asking about a more comprehensive piece. Is there an ability to share back and forth in a macro sense versus the more specific pieces you do as particular industry groups? It is understandable, and a good thing to hear, by the way; I appreciate getting that knowledge.
I probably have only a minute left, so let me ask this. I don't know whether you're aware of the recommendations. You may well be. From hearing what you've said so far, I think you're probably aware of the recommendations that your counterparts in Canada made to this committee when they made their presentation. I don't know if you were able to see those recommendations or not.
If you are aware of the recommendations, perhaps you could comment on whether you see yourself thinking those are good recommendations and you would be supportive of those recommendations, if indeed they were transferred to the U.S.