Yes, I think your point about the importance of the validation process is very well taken. I'd also like to point out that when we're talking about disasters, to me the whole process of looking into this disaster is flawed in many ways. I don't think the members of this committee would view this process as being as comprehensive and as thorough as the public would like.
If you look at air disasters when there's loss of life, a very intensive investigation happens. The site of the accident is maybe treated like a crime scene. All sorts of specialists are brought in to examine in great depth what happened, and that process can take a considerable amount of time and money. So it seems to me that, with the best efforts of the committee, we don't have in place in Canada at the moment an adequate way of fully investigating a serious occurrence and really getting all the lessons from it. We're dependent on what the supplier has told us and what we're able to find out through this process.