So from a system's perspective, for someone who has been in this field for 20-plus years, as you said, and you had a serious situation.... I know you don't want to comment on the Maple Leaf piece. I'm not asking you to do that. But let's extrapolate that to some other industry that has had some serious occurrence in their systems that has led to some sort of catastrophe of some description. I don't know how else to describe 22 deaths except as a major catastrophe. Would one not want to accelerate their audit processes to see what went wrong, to see if it couldn't be corrected more quickly?
A third party validator comes along and says, “We need to validate that for you, because folks are looking at you saying they don't think you've got it right.” Would that place not also want to be validated by that third party so they can put their hand up and say they're validated? I know from the manufacturing sector, when they developed all the new ISO 9000, 9003, and 14000 programs, that these are all externally validated systems. They're not done internally by the manufacturer. Those manufacturers aren't responsible for food safety. In some cases, they're making widgets and they have to be validated from the outside.