Thank you, Mr. Chair, and thank you to the witnesses.
Mr. Chambers, following your line of thought around some sort of a national standard that's cooperatively achieved--I think that's what you are saying--through some sort of consensus-building, bringing together all of these players from different jurisdictions in a political context, there may indeed be divergent viewpoints on what the standard should be when it comes to the industry, because you represent an industry that's quite divergent. There are those who might be at the processing end and those who might be in the retail end. It would seem to me they would have divergent views when it comes to finding a consensus, although that is a lofty goal.
It leads me to my first question. Discounting the fact that we have that many players, if we simply break it into two jurisdictional components, one being the industry and the other being the regulator, which we can call either level, or levels, of government, when a dispute comes about in your consensus model, who gets the final say?