My question is for Mr. Graham.
What we're largely trying to do with this study is to draw lessons from Canada's past interventions. We've had a track record of lack of success, or failures, in Haiti. We felt that would not necessarily be a bad thing, because you can often learn a lot more from you failures and your mistakes than you learn from when you do things right. But as we've gone through this, we've been a little bit frustrated because we've been having trouble drawing out lessons.
I've been beginning to muse out loud that perhaps what we should have done was a comparative study of the Dominican Republic versus Haiti. The former has a lot of similar past roots but has turned out to be very successful, and the other not so much so.
You have some personal experience in the Dominican Republic; you were the principal international mediator there in their post-election crisis in 1994, so you've got some understanding. So you can be my comparative study of why there is the difference between the Dominican Republic's success and the lack of success in Haiti. What can we draw from the lessons between the two?