Thank you for your question. It gives me an opportunity to clarify what I said. While I said that the issue of Aristide's return needs to be dealt with, it is not necessarily to enable him to return. In fact, personally, I believe that would lead to chaos.
However, a trial must be held, the situation needs to be clarified. That is what I meant when I talked about impunity. We must know why he was ousted. The trial must be conducted. It would be a good reason for him not to return. I am not sure that many people want him back, but his supporters are very virulent when they speak.
That is what I mean when I say we must look at that. It does not mean that he should go back. However, the situation needs to be looked at in accordance with the law.
As regards Mr. Alexis, like you, I do not know why... I worked with Mr. Alexis on two occasions when he was a professor at Université Quisqueya. He worked with us putting in place a negotiation program for conflict prevention. Based on my experience, he was someone who sought dialogue and non-violent solutions to problems.
I would like someone to explain things to me. As a Canadian citizen, I do not like being told that I cannot be given the reasons why.