Let me be brief: legal framework, yes, if legal framework is understood.
One of the key messages in our work in parliamentary development is that legal frameworks are not about passing laws. That's a part of it, but there are a great many laws on anti-corruption and on other issues in the countries where we work that have no effect. They aren't overseen and they aren't implemented effectively. So much of the work we do in the field of anti-corruption—and it is an area of concentration of the centre—is focused on the follow-up oversight work by parliamentarians to see to it that laws actually work, that they're put into effect, and that they result in prosecutions and some meaningful difference.
Secondly, the legal framework has to apply to the politicians themselves. One of the major problems with corruption in many of the countries where we work is the political process itself, the method of funding elections, and only latterly have we begun to address those issues successfully.
Working with other countries is very important. This has become a feature of much of our work. For example, we're undertaking a program of political party development in Sudan at the present time with International IDEA, which is an international organization based in Stockholm. We're going to cooperate with a U.S.-aid-funded program run by New York University in Haiti, to a degree that hasn't been the tradition in international parliamentary development.
So I think you're pointing to the future, and it's something that all of our organizations have to learn to do much better.