Okay, he doesn't want precision.
I just don't understand the thrust of the honourable member's question. I've precisely defined what development assistance is, which to my mind means accountability and transparency. Therefore, he should be far happier than leaving it as a vague, touchy-feely, “oh well, development assistance is whatever we mean it to be” statement.
That's the point of the bill. The point of the bill is to not go to the flavour of the month.