What I want to do is quite easy. The last time, when clause 2 was accepted, I was not here. We replaced, according to NDP-1, lines 9 and 10 on page 1. Also, we totally replaced lines 12 to 17. To me this is much too restrictive: “reduction in a manner that is consistent with Canadian values. Canadian foreign policy and sustainable development and that promotes”. To me it's so restrictive because, in a sense, anything could happen that's in any country in the world. There could be an earthquake or something, and if CIDA wanted to give money for an earthquake in any country, they would be unable to do so because it wouldn't be for sustainable development; it would be for humanitarian purposes at that time. To me that's too restrictive.
Also on (b), replacing lines 12 to 17 with “Canadian official development assistance abroad shall be defined exclusively with regard to this value”, I must say, to me, it is too restrictive. Instead of “exclusively” it should be “primarily”. It should be willing to give latitude to the Minister of CIDA in a certain sense. This is why I wanted to come back to this. If you agree or disagree with this, we'll see what we'll do.