What my colleague is talking about is going to this bill. We made decisions on those clauses the last time, but we didn't make a decision on this clause. So when you say we are going back and we need unanimous consent, I don't think so. All we're doing is following a procedure.
I can understand the one before that, where we made decisions inside the clauses not to revisit one sentence and all that, as you stated. So why would you now say it's out of order?