Yes, I'm in favour of going to the question too, because I think we are going around and around the same arguments.
We have a difference of perspective here, but I want to say, at the risk of repetition—you might rule me out of order, because I think there is some kind of rule of repetition—that what's ODA-able is ODA-able. The definition of ODA is an international definition, so what is ODA-able for us is ODA-able for other countries. So that's not actually a valid argument.
But I think we should call the question, because I think we're not hearing any new arguments, and we should vote and move forward.
(Amendment negatived on division)