Thank you very much.
I want to congratulate you on the trail-blazing you've been involved in. It has to be a very great honour and a tribute to you that you've been elected and re-elected by the judges to serve as the chief justice. I think that makes Canadians very proud.
I fully appreciate that you're not in a position to talk in detail about cases that are before the court, so at any point that any of us transgresses, I know you'll push back.
I'm trying to understand a bit further—you could use the instance of Darfur and the Sudan, I guess, as a case in point or an example of where a country is not a signatory to the treaty of Rome and then, by referral from the Security Council, is brought before the court—how you deal with the fact that, as you've outlined in your presentation, the ability of the court to succeed in its mandate depends upon the cooperation of the state party. I'm wondering if you can talk a little bit, either by further reference to Sudan or in general, about what the obstacles are and whether there are things the international community can do, either through global opinion, international agencies, or whatever, to help put pressure on a country to cooperate. Or is the situation that if they don't cooperate, that's it, there's not really much of anything any committed parties can do to assist in that regard?