I believe we've drawn lessons from the experience of the ad hoc tribunals, in particular that it is necessary to conduct prosecutions as efficiently and rapidly as possible, to the extent that's compatible with the administration of justice as it should be carried out.
The Statute itself contains provisions in this regard, for example the creation of a preliminary division which is designed to eliminate from the trial itself everything that should precede it. We've developed regulations for the Court, which is trying to be as efficient as possible. It's mainly in that sense that we're drawing on the experience of the ad hoc tribunals.
Knowing whether that has an influence on ratifications is a highly speculative question that is very hard to answer. However, we're determined to do what we can to show, in the next few years, that the Court is not only an impartial and effective judicial body — that doesn't trouble me, because I believe we'll do that — but also a Court that is part of a system in which everyone contributes: the States, international organizations, the NGOs. If people ultimately understand that the Court is part of a system, it will be successful.