To clarify my thoughts, I appreciate Madam Barbot's concern about not having time to get to the motions. My thought was that if these were motions that were arbitrarily thrown on to the order of precedence and were not dealt with, or were not asked to be dealt with, they should be removed after two meetings if someone hasn't said, listen, we haven't been able to get to my motion and I would still like to get to it next week. I thought of this, as opposed to arbitrarily filling up the paper with all kinds of motions.
Once again, in my experience in HR, we had 30 motions that no one was talking about, yet we always had to bring them forward every week. This is not to say that people can't bring them back. This is not to say that if someone is going to be away they couldn't say, “I'm not going to be here next week to deal with it, but I'd like it to remain on.” This is dealing with motions that clearly are set there that the committee has no intention of dealing with at the present time. That would be my thought, just to balance that off.