Thank you, Mr. Obhrai, for those points.
I think the last thing that any of us would want to see is a report that isn't clearly reflective of what we've seen, a report that's filed because of an artificial deadline and that really has no substance to it. So, for that, I applaud those for allowing us the opportunity to include all the testimony that has been heard prior to the summer break.
That does create some difficulties, perhaps, for some of the new members. We have a number of new members on the committee who are then asked to sign on to a lot of witnesses on different sides of the report. Those will be reflected in this report. So if you're including that much, we're in a very tight timeline.
I understand what you're saying. In some measure, it's accountability that we're asking for with that date. We don't just want to study forever and never bring in a report, but I'll tell you, it would have to be a balanced report. I'm one who thinks that the more we can work together.... We can have three pages of a preliminary report from the committee. We can have eight pages from this group, six pages from the next party, five pages from over here, and it's a shemozzle. Is it workable? I guess that's what we're here to find out.
Is there anyone else?
Madame Barbot, and then Mr. Goldring.