That's why I asked the committee to take a very close look at what you're changing here. This motion of Mr. Dewar's is achievable, I think, the way it's written; dealing with finances and public investment is one thing. But when we're talking about a major study and are now going to include all the NGOs, include all the civil society groups, include the parliamentary groups, when do we want to do it?
There's another motion coming up on Burma. The timelines on Burma.... The event is happening now. We've been remarkably good at doing studies after the fact, in so many cases. Burma is rather important, Afghanistan is very important, and Sudan is, unquestionably. All of these are very important works. But when we broaden this thing out to the extent that I fear that this amendment may do, all of a sudden it becomes a full-course meal, a full-course study. I accept what your concern is.
We have Mr. Obhrai, then Mr. Dewar and Madame Barbot.