Then you have a bigger study than what the original motion means. I think what Mr. Dewar has done—
Again, Paul, listen to me. What you have done is to word a motion that I think was thought out. It's not broadened. The scope in your motion here is manageable. But I think when you start now trying to satisfy Madame Barbot by saying no longer is it a genocide, because a genocide.... I mean, it's an addition to it.
Maybe you want a big study, but this motion did not ask for a massive study on Sudan--it asked for Darfur. And it did not make specific reference to genocide; now it does. Crimes against humanity was not mentioned; now it is. That's changing this motion. I think that unless we can come up with something that satisfies that particular aspect of it, we'll have to come up with another motion on another day.