Evidence of meeting #21 for Foreign Affairs and International Development in the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was haitian.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Jean-Paul Hubert  Interim President, Rights and Democracy
Danièle Magloire  Coordinator, Haiti Office, Rights and Democracy
John Wood  Program Manager, Haiti, Parliamentary Centre
Carlo Dade  Executive Director, Canadian Foundation for the Americas (FOCAL)
Ginette Martin  Acting Director General, Latin America and Caribbean Bureau, Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade
Luc Fréchette  Director General, Haiti and Dominican Republic, Americas Branch, Canadian International Development Agency
Superintendent David Beer  Director General, International Policing, Royal Canadian Mounted Police
Robert Derouin  Director General, Stabilization and Reconstruction Task Force (START) Secretariat, Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Deepak Obhrai Conservative Calgary East, AB

Mr. Chair, the accusation of my not making this committee work is absolutely ridiculous.

Nevertheless, the point is that—as we discussed this matter down in the steering committee—the subcommittee on human rights is the appropriate place for this to be in. So the work is not being stopped; the work is getting done. There is not a question about this.

The issue on Radarsat was that it was a time-sensitive issue. Mr. Dewar wants something practical. Obviously it's an NDP motion. So as far as I am concerned, it doesn't really matter to us whether they come along or not, but it's up to them. Anyway, if the opposition is not willing to do that—

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kevin Sorenson

Pardon me, Mr. Obhrai, but in all fairness here, we need some type of a motion. You've asked for consent, but are you asking to suspend debate on this?

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Deepak Obhrai Conservative Calgary East, AB

I am seeking to know the views here before I put the motion. There is no point in putting a motion and letting my debate go, if, the way I see it, heads are just twisting and saying no, which is the usual thing. Whenever I speak the opposition will always say no. So they have to—

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kevin Sorenson

Madame Barbot.

5:20 p.m.

Bloc

Vivian Barbot Bloc Papineau, QC

I really don't understand how the parliamentary secretary, who is always telling us that he represents the government, can come here this afternoon and, without even discussing it with the person making the motion, ask us to substitute Mr. Dewar's motion for mine, whereas we have been working on it for several weeks.

I would like to hear his explanation. Why this change? What is his aim? Is he going to guarantee to us that in the next five minutes he will be adopting Mr. Dewar's motion? That would be a fine proposal on his part.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Deepak Obhrai Conservative Calgary East, AB

Yes, that's very good. I still have 195 countries to speak about.

Okay, I am saying this. The Dewar motion is time-sensitive, this one is not, and we had agreed that this could very easily go down to the subcommittee, which had agreed to do that.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kevin Sorenson

Mr. Obhrai, why is Mr. Dewar's motion time-sensitive? Is that the date in April it has extended to, and it's specific to that date in April?

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Deepak Obhrai Conservative Calgary East, AB

Yes, that's right. That's why I'm saying....

In the meantime, I'm also saying that this one, where Madame Barbot says she has worked so much, is not off the table. It goes back to the subcommittee on human rights, which has agreed to listen to that.

I'm just putting this as a suggestion.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kevin Sorenson

It's a suggestion. All right.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Deepak Obhrai Conservative Calgary East, AB

Yes, this is the suggestion I'm putting forward. If it is agreeable, then we will move this there and we will go back to Mr. Dewar's motion and move forward to getting other business done.

There are a lot of motions over here that need to be looked after and done. So I am suggesting, if Madame Barbot accepts that this motion moves to the subcommittee on human rights, that's fine with us. Then we will move it with Mr. Dewar's motion.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kevin Sorenson

Is it fine with you, if you were to move Mr. Dewar's motion ahead of Madame Barbot's, if she is not willing to have it go to subcommittee, because we've already spoken about that, to then come back to this motion?

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Deepak Obhrai Conservative Calgary East, AB

No. We would like to have this motion go to the subcommittee first.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kevin Sorenson

That would be your preference.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Deepak Obhrai Conservative Calgary East, AB

It would give us the opportunity to move forward.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kevin Sorenson

You're saying there's only one option here, and that's to leapfrog Mr. Dewar's ahead and send hers to the subcommittee, but you would not look at doing Mr. Dewar's first and then coming back to this one.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Deepak Obhrai Conservative Calgary East, AB

If, for example, to Madame Barbot also, the subcommittee on human rights for some reason comes along and says that they have difficulty doing this, she can always bring back this motion again. As you know, the opposition will have to work this out anyway.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kevin Sorenson

We do have a problem, Mr. Obhrai, because we've already debated sending it to the subcommittee.

5:20 p.m.

Conservative

Deepak Obhrai Conservative Calgary East, AB

It doesn't matter, I'm putting the suggestion again. I know you've debated it. I'm putting it again. We debated something else in the steering committee as well, but that didn't happen, so the opposition.... I'm just putting this motion forward so we can get Mr. Dewar's--

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kevin Sorenson

So it is a motion.

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Deepak Obhrai Conservative Calgary East, AB

Well, no, I'm asking for an opinion here. Is she agreeable that we put a motion?

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kevin Sorenson

We would need a consensus, and I don't sense right now that we have that consensus, so we'll continue debate on Madame Barbot's motion.

She says no.

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Deepak Obhrai Conservative Calgary East, AB

She's saying no, so we are not accepting a time-sensitive motion from the NDP. Is that what...? At this committee, I want it very clear, so the Liberals who are sitting out there can understand what is happening here. We have a time-sensitive motion that's sitting out there and we don't want to debate it, but we want to debate a motion here brought by Madame Barbot, which is not time-sensitive, right, and then we say this committee is not working. Am I getting it clear?

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kevin Sorenson

I don't want to take up all the debate on the motions, but what I'm saying is if your motion would have been to go to Mr. Dewar's motion and then come back to Madame Barbot's, that might have been acceptable, but we've already debated the fact of which committee would do it. That may be an option to her. That may not be.

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Deepak Obhrai Conservative Calgary East, AB

That's what I'm asking, if this is an option to vote and I can put this forward and if she agrees in the spirit of cooperation, move forward.

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Kevin Sorenson

But she has said no to sending it to the subcommittee.