My question was going to be along that same line, that the understanding of this would be that the organization itself would be covering the costs of grievances.
Could you explain this convention itself? Is it a type of rules? Is it a type of standards? There must be a lot of text to it. Is this something that gives guidance to many of these countries so that it never gets to the grievance stage?
If they're signatories to it, they're fully apprised of it. By being a signatory, it's certainly an encouraging thing for countries to want to sign up to it, just because of the confidence it would give investors.
So can this be perceived as a type of guidance mechanism before it comes to the grievance level?