I would like to return to the point raised by Dr. Patry. I think I heard him say that there were times when travelling when you found it necessary for good reasons to hear testimony by yourself as the chair at that time. If we're saying one and one, are we now precluding that this kind of scenario could happen, where only one member could actually hear testimony if the second one were disabled? That's not what you're saying?
On February 2nd, 2009. See this statement in context.