I certainly would agree that...I have difficulty understanding why people who have not had input into the crafting of this report want to have it reissued.
I also have a concern here about how many times you can keep reissuing or sending in the same report. Is it not like repeating a three-month-old press release? Do you not lose some of your impact by doing it this way? Do you not water down the importance of it? If you're looking for media attention, would the media itself not question this and have to turn back the clock to see if they had received this report at some time in the past and that it's really a duplicate of their efforts? In other words, does that not water down the impact of it, by reissuing and repeating exactly the same report? I suppose the media, if that's the intention of it, are more geared up to having something that's factual, that's up to date.
Also, has there not been a response to this report?