As far as the humanitarian situation in Darfur is concerned, there are 85 NGOs operating in Darfur, 13 UN agencies, and only 13 have been expelled. Most of them will probably come back in one form or another. There is a huge humanitarian assistance operation in Darfur. Even if some NGOs have been expelled, others stay, and there will be this big operation for some time to come. I don't think we should be completely worried about that. It's a very difficult environment to operate in for humanitarian NGOs and UN agencies, but it's one of the largest crises. It's also the largest humanitarian operation in the world right now. Four million people are on food assistance and 2.7 million people are in camps serviced by NGOs and so on.
In terms of the helicopters, I think the dilemma goes way beyond this particular mission. There is an increase, or an inflation, of mandates given to peacekeeping missions that include the protection of civilians and the responsibility to protect philosophy. These are robust mandates. Missions are sent into situations of conflict, active conflict sometimes, that really border on war fighting. The mandate is not peacekeeping, but it's very robust peacekeeping. It's almost war fighting. We see that in Sudan and other places. For example, we see that in the eastern Congo. We could have seen that in Somalia. There was even a discussion that a mission should be sent to Somalia.
The question really is, what does the international community want? It's either robust peacekeeping, in which case we have to make the mission's effective fighting forces capable of protecting civilians, helicopters have to be sent, and missions have to be supported, or--